The 69th annual Golden Globe Awards were announced Sunday night, and the event is a huge deal for folks who closely follow the entertainment scene. In addition to honoring the best in motion pictures, awards are given in television as well.
I used to always look forward to the Globes and typically watched the whole ceremony in its entirety. Yes, awards shows can be boring and tedious; I’m well aware of that. But I also would easily get sucked into the celebrities (and what they were — and sometimes weren’t) wearing and become caught up in who might win the major awards. After all, there was once a time when I went to movies — and rented them — a lot.
Nowadays, though, life is different. Yes, I might have watched the Globes had I been home Sunday night. But, even though I was at work, I really didn’t feel like I was missing that much.
Perhaps this is because many of the movies that earned top honors are ones I either have no interest in or haven’t come to Worthington. Here’s a prime example: “The Artist.”
For the unaware, “The Artist” is a throwback to the 1920s, in that it’s a silent movie filmed in black-and-white. I’ve watched the trailer and it looks great. But … I have a strong suspicion that I will have to wait until its release on DVD and Blu-ray.
“The Artist” won Golden Globes Sunday night for Best Picture, Musical or Comedy, as well as Best Actor, Musical or Comedy (Jean Dujardin, who I have never heard of) and Best Original Score. (Well, I guess it’s not all silent, but I guess that’s part of the appeal. The movies of the silent era always seemed to have distinctive music — I once got to see the 1927 science film “Metropolis” on a huge theater screen at Schenectady, N.Y.’s Proctor’s Theatre with live, out-of-this-world organ accompaniment.)
I also remember loving Mel Brooks’ “Silent Movie” as a kid, and I’m fairly certain that this film made some kind of impact on my younger brother, too. From age 7 up through high school, Ian made a number of Super 8 movies with no sound, no music and plenty of hysterical “acting” by several of his friends, not to mention yours truly.
Ian recently got around to posting a handful of these movies online, apparently believing that in the wake of last year’s “Super 8” that some folks may have a interest in watching some of these classics. Writes Ian on his website:
“Unlike in the film ‘Super 8,’ these movies don’t have any sound. When we used to watch them at home, the whirring of the projector would fill the room and I would typically narrate sections so viewers would understand what the heck was going on. Watching them on a computer in their glorious silence is a bit strange — I’m almost tempted to dub in a projector sound effect just so there’s something there!”
Adding any additional noise outside of the aforementioned whirring, though, would ruin the overall cinematic ambience of the masterpiece “The Bad Guy. “ Notes Ian, “This was the last movie to feature my brother in a starring role, possibly because he became increasingly more demanding with each new production.”
Any chance of me advancing my budding movie-acting career probably perished with “The Bad Guy.” But I still stayed very, very interested in the silver screen for a long, long time.
And now, I settle for afternoon matinees of “Chipwrecked.” In case you’re wondering, that was not up for any awards Sunday night.
